Compare
One record for the whole client relationship.
Every call, message, meeting and promise on one record per client, with an AI coordinator that has read all of it. Nothing else on this page does that, and the rest of this page is us showing our working.
What the others don't have.
Against the tools a firm already keeps. WasilX works alongside them. Hover or tap a half mark to see why.
| What it does | Phone systemsBT, RingCentral | Answering servicesMoneypenny | Practice systemsClio, LEAP | Legal CRMsClio Grow, Intapp | Legal AIHarvey, Legora | Copilot and notetakersCopilot, Otter |  WasilX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Answers your existing number, landline included, onto the matter | RingCentral's AI receptionist answers your current numbers, but logs to Salesforce or HubSpot, not a legal matter. | Moneypenny's AI receptionist answers your diverted number and logs to HubSpot or Salesforce, not a matter. | Clio Grow's AI picks up after-hours calls, in the US only, and books leads. Nothing goes onto a matter. | ||||
| Every call, email and meeting lands on the client's matter | Intapp syncs email and meetings to relationships automatically. Phone calls are not mentioned. | Copilot recaps Teams calls and meetings in Teams, not on a client matter. | |||||
| Meeting notes only attendees see; actions wait for a lawyer | |||||||
| Answers cited to your firm's own record, within your permissions | Clio Work gives cited answers from a matter's documents and the law, not from its calls and meetings. | Harvey and Legora cite documents and email, not calls or meetings. | Copilot answers over mail, chats and meetings you can open. It has no client matter record. | ||||
| Firm-wide oversight that never reveals a hidden file |
A half mark means that kind of tool does some of the row. Hover or tap it for why. WasilX works alongside all of them.
WasilX has all of it.
What a firm's day looks like with WasilX.
Speed to lead, court hours, repeat callers, follow-up and meeting write-ups, set against how each one goes today.
See it side by sideFour things none of the tools above does.
- One partner's matter stays out of another partner's view
- Meeting access narrows the file, it never widens it. Adding a colleague to a matter does not hand them every note ever recorded on it, and somebody who cannot read a meeting sees nothing about it at all: not a summary, not a count, not that it happened.
- The consultation writes itself up onto the matter
- Not a transcript in an inbox. A structured note with agreed actions, owners and dates, against the file, attributed per speaker when everyone joins from their own device, including a client who never makes an account.
- You can ask the firm's own record a question
- What changed on this matter, who is still waiting, what was promised on a call in March. Answered from your rows with the source beside it, and bounded by what the person asking is allowed to see.
- Cam confirms who is calling before it says anything about a file
- A phone can be shared and caller ID can be faked, so continuity waits for identity. No answering service does this, because no answering service has the file.
Harvey and Legora are not what we replace.
They make the legal work better: research, drafting, review. None of it reaches your client until a lawyer sends it, and none of it knows whether anybody did. We are the part your client actually meets. A firm running one of them is a better fit for us, not a worse one.
Bring the tool you are comparing us against.
We would rather walk through the gap on a call than have you find it during a pilot.
Request demo